At least one member must belong to a different department to the student’s. The committee must comprise postdoctoral researchers who are independent of the project and who possess adequate subject knowledge. The director of doctoral studies appoints a committee of three members after the proposal from the doctoral student and supervisor. In addition, it gives doctoral students and supervisors useful experience in interpreting text matching reports. The purpose is to increase the knowledge regarding scientific writing among doctoral students, and in the long term increase the quality of the doctoral theses. The iThenticate report is not included in the documents sent to the half-time committee, but the doctoral student must be prepared to answer questions from the committee regarding scientific writing and plagiarism. A text of low quality might even be a better basis for an interesting and educational discussion than a perfectly written text. This a learning activity, not an examination, and there will be no consequences if plagiarism would be found. The literature review does not have to be finished a draft will do fine. Note that this must be done before notifying the department of the half-time review, see an overview of the routine above. The doctoral student shall run their literature review, part of the half-time report, through the text matching software iThenticate in preparation for a discussion with their supervisor(s) on scientific writing. The discussion should cover issues such as reference management, plagiarism, self-plagiarism and copyright. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |